Public Information and the Generational Divide

Older folks seeking public records via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) look to a government official and ask, “May I have...?”  They wonder how long they must wait for a response and how much it will cost.

Millennials seeking public records, expecting proactive disclosure, look at their tablets and ask themselves, “Where can I find...?”  More and more the information will be at their fingertips. They don’t worry about cost, knowing the information will be free.

Older folks wishing to improve FOIA can beseech their legislators, but are often ignored.

Millennials, determined to exploit new technology, look to people like Derek Dobies of Jackson, Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, John Lui of New York and Dr. Clifford Lampe at the University of Michigan for guidance.

It's almost as if the two groups occupy parallel universes. The older group seems to dwell on tinkering with the clunky model of information by request to a government gatekeeper, for all appearances oblivious to the fast, easy and free access available online through proactive disclosure.

Communities with governments that resist proactive disclosure will decline.

Communities with governments that practice openness will thrive.

How do I know? I read tarot cards.

Independent State Agency Reviewed 3400 Open Government Issues Last Year

Take my word for it, I don't obsess over Illinois open records and meetings issues, although my last two blog posts might suggest otherwise.  And now comes the third.

By coincidence, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan just released some interesting Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Open Meetings Act (OMA) statistics.

It was reported yesterday (Friday, 3-14-14) that the Illinois AG's Public Access Bureau (PAB) handled 3400 open government cases last year. Can anybody show me an independent government office in Michigan with a record anything like that?

PAB also conducted 35 training sessions for the public and government personnel during 2013.

These activities are examples of major reforms adopted in Illinois in 2009.  Attempts at reform in Michigan have been stalled for years.

FOIA: A Few Highlights of Illinois' Statute

Compare this with bills pending in the Michigan Legislature to upgrade our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Bear in mind that relying on sketchy descriptions of a statute is risky.  It’s best to read the whole thing, together with related court decisions.  Among the subjects glossed over in this review are various response time limitations and FOIA requests for commercial purposes.

Illinois legislators drafted and passed a major overhaul of their FOIA in 2009, effective January 1, 2010.  In the preamble, legislators acknowledge that technology might outpace their ability to keep up, but the Act’s principles are to apply as much as possible.

Of particular interest to me, the statute defines and delineates categories of “recurrent requester.” Remember the saga of Kim Orlich and the City of Belding?  Wouldn’t happen in Illinois.

The statute applies to a long list of public bodies, including executive and legislative bodies  

(but not the General Assembly itself).  A public body may not require an information seeker to use a standard form.

Access to records is presumed open.  The burden is on the government to overcome the presumption.  Proof must be clear and convincing.

If the response of a public body to a request for records is late, no fee may be charged for the records.

There are provisions for requests that are unduly burdensome to the public body.

Requests for commercial purposes are treated separately.

The highest hourly rate that staff can charge is $10.00, but the first eight hours are free.

The statute creates the position of Public Access Counselor (PAC) under the Attorney General (AG).  The AG is empowered to subpoena public records.

The PAC may issue (ex parte) advisory opinions at the request of a public body, but such opinions are neither final nor subject to administrative review.

A person whose request for records has been denied may go directly to the circuit court for the county in which he or she resides or seek a less formal review by the PAC.

In reviewing denials of FOIA requests, the PAC makes findings of fact and conclusions of law. The PAC is required to issue an opinion within 60 days.  The opinion is binding, subject to administrative and/or circuit court appeal.

If the matter goes to circuit court, it’s heard de novo (or “anew”), which I take to mean the court can draw its own conclusions from any statements or other evidence already accepted in earlier proceedings.

The statute establishes (reaffirms?) the circuit court’s contempt powers to compel public body personnel to comply with the court’s orders.  The court is authorized to award a successful information seeker reasonable attorney fees.  Civil penalties against a public body may range from $2500 to $5000.

Illinois’ FOIA can be found at:

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=85&ChapterID=2

FOIA Beyond Our Borders

 

The states with the most media coverage of their FOIA activity in recent months are Illinois, South Carolina, Virginia and Connecticut.

ILLINOIS:  Most of the news about FOIA results from municipal denials of FOIA requests which citizens appeal to a special section of the state’s Office of Attorney General.  When the Assistant AG in this section rules in favor of the appellant, the AAG usually fires a shot across the municipality’s bow.  If the warning isn’t heeded, the AAG can compel compliance.  The Illinois statute has real teeth.

SOUTH CAROLINA:  The legislature floats a lot of trial balloons about tinkering with FOIA.  Notable among them are proposals for legislative transparency.

VIRGINIA:  Much of the activity here concerns partisan political bickering over FOIA adjustments, reflecting transition turmoil prominent in the state over the past couple of years.  There was an uproar when the legislature banned out-of-state FOIA requests.

CONNECTICUT:  The  increased volume of FOIA news in this state can be attributed to privacy issues arising from the Sandy Hook Elementary School tragedy.

On the international scene, Ireland, India and Nigeria have had frequent news coverage of FOIA events.

Bermuda and the Philippines are struggling with initial FOIA legislation.  (Better late than never.)

CELEBRATE SUNSHINE WEEK !